Tag Archives: Nikon D850

Photons to Photos Preliminary Dynamic Range Results Are In Fujifilm GFX vs Sony a7RIII vs Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark IV

Photons to Photos Preliminary dynamic range results have been released and they are certainly disappointing for Sony fans if you’re not familiar with the site, which always skews conservatively. You can expect the Sony a7RIII to perform slightly better when final results are available, but it’s unlikely it will surpass the GFX, which makes me […]

Posted in Fujifilm GFX, Fujifilm GFX 50S | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

First Fujifilm GFX vs Sony a7RIII vs Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark IV Comparison

The comparison between the Fujifilm GFX vs Sony a7RIII vs Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark IV was inevitable and while the results are very interesting they could have been a little more clinical. imaging-resource put this comparison together and they tried to match the four systems as closely as they could but used some slightly different settings […]

Posted in Fujifilm GFX, Fujifilm GFX 50S | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

DXOMark Pentax 645 Debacle and Potential Fujifilm GFX 50S Results

Testing Medium format cameras isn’t something new for DXO Mark and when they called the D850 the first DSLR to cross the 100 mark they should have been clear by adding the first full fame DSLR since the 645Z has a DSLR design. It is surprising to see how the 645Z and D850 landscape and portrait measurements […]

Posted in Fujifilm GFX, Fujifilm GFX 50S | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Nikon D850 Estimated by Photons to Photos

Photons to Photos has a good track record of getting their estimate close to right and being completely independent. To most, it is obvious that the GFX will continue to dominate, but if you need data photons to photos is once again out in front comparing the Fujifilm GFX 50S to the new Nikon D850. […]

Posted in Fujifilm GFX, Fujifilm GFX 50S | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments