Fuji Guys on F-Log and LUT

It took Fujifilm a few years to really dial in their video performance, which only started to get good around the release of the Fujifilm X-T2 with the introduction of F-Log. Since then Fujifilm has added features like RAW video to cameras like the GFX100, which represents the next logical step beyond F-Log, but until it is more widely adopted F-Log will likely remain the standard for most videographers.

If you would like the latest LUT for Fujifilm cameras they are available here Above you can see the Fuji Guys take on the current state of F-Log in Fujifilm cameras and below I have created a summary of the above video:

  • Log footage lets you record very flat image data that is ideal of post-processing giving the maximum flexibility in post
  • Log helps you to get the max dynamic range that the camera can create
  • F-Log is captured in Rec. 2020
  • White balance can be hard to get right with log because the image is so washed out so it is best to dial in white balance manually in advance
  • Fujifilm provides LUT that will help you to quickly turn a log image into a usable Eterna color profile based video
  • Fujifilm’s latest cameras have F-Log assist that will load a profile in to help dial in your capture settings giving you a Rec. 709 preview
  • If you are using an external recorder you can load LUTs onto the recorder
  • There are creative and technical LUTs
  • Most editors allow you to load LUTs
  • Recording with Eterna is the fastest way to make a video, but if the situation is high dynamic range use F-Log

Fujifilm GFX100S: B&H Photo / Amazon / Moment / Adorama
Fujifilm GFX100: B&H Photo / Amazon / Adorama

Fujifilm X-T4: B&H Photo / Amazon / Adorama
Fujifilm X-E4:
 B&H Photo / Amazon / Moment / Adorama

Follow Fujiaddict on Facebook, TwitterInstagram, and YouTube

Plus our owners’ groups
Fujifilm GFX Owners Group
Fujifilm X-H Owners Group
Fujifilm X-T Owners Group
Fujifilm X-S Owners Group
Fujifilm X-Pro Owners Group
Fujifilm X-E Owners Group
Fujifilm X-A Owners Group
Fujifilm X100 Owners Group

Posted in Software | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Fujifilm Launches Highly-Sensitive and Rapid Covid-19 Antigen Test


Katherine John – IVD Business Manager, FUJIFILM UK With Rapid Covid-19 Antigen Test Above

Fujifilm Launches Highly-Sensitive and Rapid Covid-19 Antigen Test
Fujifilm has developed a highly sensitive and rapid Covid-19 antigen test kit using its proprietary silver amplification immunochromatography (or lateral flow) method.  This technology, used in the photo-developing process, enhances the sensitivity of test results by detecting the virus at an early stage and with relatively low levels of viral load.

The sensitivity of the Fujifilm antigen test has the potential to reduce both false negatives and false positives, providing a reliable, accurate result even in non-symptomatic and asymptomatic test subjects.  The reduction in false negatives is achieved by the highly sensitive test detecting early stages of infection and those who are asymptomatic, meaning test subjects can immediately self-isolate to protect the wider community.

Whilst a reduction in false negatives helps to prevent further infections, a reduction in false positives also has a significant impact on society.  If a false positive result is received, not only that individual but also a wide circle of family, colleagues, fellow pupils or students and other contacts will be required to isolate.  The economic, educational and social consequences this has is substantial, and as we start to lift lockdown public trust in the testing system will be important to ensure compliance with isolation requirements.

The Fujifilm lateral flow test kit uses nasopharyngeal swab samples which can be performed within the community as well as clinical settings.  This enables a faster result than laboratory tests, with the Fujifilm antigen kits providing results in just 10-13 minutes.  Fujifilm introduced their silver amplification technology for antigen testing in 2011 with the IMMUNO AG analyser (which offers highly sensitive testing for influenza, RS virus and adenovirus) and has now developed the technology to detect the presence of Covid-19.

Our new Covid-19 lateral flow test is fast and simple to use” said Katherine John, IVD Business Manager, FUJIFILM UK.  “As society opens up from lockdown testing will be commonplace not only in healthcare and education, but across many sectors including travel, hospitality, culture, sport and events.  It’s important that the testing solutions available to these industries are reliable and accurate, and our antigen test has proven to be highly sensitive even at relatively low viral load.

Other Avigan/COVID-19/Hydro Ag +/Fujifilm Biomedical Coverage
(123456789, 10111213141516171819202122232425, 2627282930313233343536373839, 40, 41)

Please don’t forget to follow us on FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTube

Plus our owners’ groups
Fujifilm GFX Owners Group
Fujifilm X-H Owners Group
Fujifilm X-T Owners Group
Fujifilm X-S Owners Group
Fujifilm X-Pro Owners Group
Fujifilm X-E Owners Group
Fujifilm X-A Owners Group
Fujifilm X100 Owners Group

Posted in Press releases | Leave a comment

Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 APO Size Comparison


Camerasizecomparison added the Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 APO to its comparison database and it is a pretty large lens as you can see. I am kind of surprised because most of the Laowa designs that I own are quite compact in comparison to similar focal length/aperture lenses.

Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO: VenusOptics

Please don’t forget to follow us on FacebookTwitterInstagramYouPicYouTube

Plus our owners’ groups
Fujifilm GFX Owners Group
Fujifilm X-H Owners Group
Fujifilm X-T Owners Group
Fujifilm X-S Owners Group
Fujifilm X-Pro Owners Group
Fujifilm X-E Owners Group
Fujifilm X-A Owners Group
Fujifilm X100 Owners Group

via Camerasize

Posted in 3rd Party Lens | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

CameraLabs: Fujifilm GFX100S vs GFX100 vs Sony A1

I already did a specs comparison between the GFX100S and Sony a1 here based on the info available at the time. Now Gordon Laing has released a hands-on comparison of the two cameras, which you can watch above or read the summary of below:

  • 4th GFX camera
  • Almost half the price of the GFX100 with essentially the same capabilities
  • Fujifilm GFX 50S is discontinued
  • The Full Frame Sony A1 actually costs more than the GFX100S
  • The big bump from the GFX50S is gone
  • Similar feels similar to a 5D or D800
  • Changing the battery let Fujifilm to move the battery into the grip
  • There is no portrait grip or dual batteries but it is smaller all around and 500g lighter
  • New battery can do about 460 frames so battery life is good but you will want a second battery
  • The EVF is now fixed and smaller than the GFX100, but it is still comparable to other cameras
  • Sony has a more detailed viewfinder, but Fujifilm’s viewfinder doesn’t hold the camera back
  • The main monitor hasn’t changed on the GFX
  • PASM mode dial on the GFX100S which is different than other GFX cameras
  • Can shoot for up to 60 min on the GFX100S
  • 1.8″ eink display that’s like the one on the GFX100 and it can be reversed from white to black
  • GFX100S misses the second einck display of the GFX100
  • GFX100S should have larger controls that are backlit
  • GFX cameras feel like X cameras in the menus
  • UHS-II dual card slots that are fast enough for the 5fps of the GFX
  • 12-bit RAW can be outputted via mini HDMI
  • GFX lenses are great, but there are more lenses for full-frame bodies
  • The 102MP sensor is the selling point of the GFX
  • The IBIS is very useful
  • Could shoot the 45mm f/2.8 with IBIS at 1/10th a second, but without he needs to shoot 1/80th
  • IBIS is also good for video
  • The AF is as fast as other cameras with smaller lenses
  • The GFX feels like using a smaller format camera
  • The standard test chart had to be shot at double the distance since the camera out resolved the test chart filling the frame
  • GFX100S easily out resolves the Sony Alpha 1
  • Both cameras do better with pixel shift and the Alpha 1 can out resolve a single shot of the GFX100S, but if you use multishot with the GFX100S you end up out resolving the Sony and chart again
  • No camera under 10k out resolves the GFX100
  • GFX100 can easily recover color data in the dark by lifting the shadows
  • 4k recording is different on each camera due to how the cameras come up with their 4k from their sensors
  • Motion tracking in video is fine for somewhat static subjects, but the motion isn’t tracked well in video
  • GFX100S is Fujifilm’s most compelling camera to date
  • The GFX100 and GFX100S perform like smaller sensor cameras, but the GFX100S is more portable
  • The GFX100 can be shot casually thanks to its IBIS
  • If you’re into fast sports and wildlife a camera like the Sony A1 might be better
  • GFX only has 12 lenses at this time, but full-frame cameras have numerous choices
  • GFX100S is best for photographers that demand the best quality and it speaks to your heart in a way other cameras do not
  • There will be more videos comparing these cameras soon

Fujifilm GFX100S: B&H Photo / Amazon / Moment / Adorama
Fujifilm GFX100: B&H Photo / Amazon / Moment / Adorama
Sony A1: B&H Photo / Amazon / Moment / Adorama

Please don’t forget to follow us on FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTube

Plus our owners’ groups
Fujifilm GFX Owners Group
Fujifilm X-H Owners Group
Fujifilm X-T Owners Group
Fujifilm X-S Owners Group
Fujifilm X-Pro Owners Group
Fujifilm X-E Owners Group
Fujifilm X-A Owners Group
Fujifilm X100 Owners Group

Posted in Fujifilm GFX, Fujifilm GFX 100, Fujifilm GFX 100 Megapixel, Fujifilm GFX 100S, Fujifilm GFX 50R, Fujifilm GFX 50S, Fujifilm GFX100 IR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 APO Announced


Laowa just annoucned the Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO and you can order it directly from VenusOptics.

Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO is a magnificent f/0.95 Standard lens for the Cropped Frame(APS-C) camera. Achieving the APO design, enjoy the clear images with well controlled chromatic aberration. The ultra-fast aperture lens with APO is perfect for low light photography, shallow depth of field portrait and narrative videography. It is blessed with crystal clear details, extraordinary sharpness and exquisite bokeh.

Shipping starts from Early May for Fuji X and Sony E mount.
The Nikon Z and Canon RF will be shipped from Mid May.

Reviews / Hands-on / More
jonasraskphotography

Please don’t forget to follow us on FacebookTwitterInstagramYouPicYouTube

Plus our owners’ groups
Fujifilm GFX Owners Group
Fujifilm X-H Owners Group
Fujifilm X-T Owners Group
Fujifilm X-S Owners Group
Fujifilm X-Pro Owners Group
Fujifilm X-E Owners Group
Fujifilm X-A Owners Group
Fujifilm X100 Owners Group

Posted in 3rd Party Lens | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Technical Analysis: Fujifilm GFX 100S, GF80mm, GF30mm, GF23mm, GF250mm, 1.4xTC, Metabones, and More


I have been a fan of Jim Kasson for a while now and decided to just start doing roundups of his excellent technical analysis for people to bing on like I do. The last roundup we shared from The Last Word can be found here. Jim has covered a lot more since my last roundup, which you can read more about below:

The Last Word – GFX Natural Live View and raw file histograms

Basically, the white balance of the camera in 5500 Kelvin light with the camera white balance set correctly is too green to properly represent the raw file. In the past, I’ve found that it takes about a CC30M to approximately match the camera’s histogram to the raw histogram, and the Natural Live View mode doesn’t seem to change that at all.

The Last Word – Adobe Super Resolution

Good performance. False color essentially eliminated with both of the AI demasicing techniques.

The Last Word – GFX 100S shadow performance with 14 and 16 bit precision

I guess I can convince myself that the 16-bit version is a bit better, but not by enough to make a material difference in normal photography. The 14-bit version is greener in the blacks. Probably due to small differences in the black point of the files. Green shadows indicates too high a black point.

The Last Word – GFX 100S dark-field histograms

You can tell a lot about a camera without attaching a lens. The first 70 or 80 images I made with the GFX 100S were with the body cap still installed. In this post, I’ll show you some histograms of the dark field raw files under the following conditions, and tell you what I learned from them.

The Last Word – GFX 100S read noise and EDR vs ISO setting

These curves show the engineering dynamic range (EDR), which I’m defining here as full scale divided by the root-mean-square (rms) value of the read noise, using lossless compression. Shutter speed was 1/1000 second. All these tests were done with no lens. I used a body cap to get the dark field. The curves are all done using 600×600 pixel crops that have been shifted leftward just far enough to avoid the center column of the sensor, which is sometimes the site of  aberrant behavior.

The Last Word – Fuji GFX 100S EDR vs shutter speed

This is essentially the same result that I got when I tested the GFX 100. Since the sensors appear to be the same, I’m not going to do photon transfer curves for the GFX 100S. I have no reason to think they won’t be the same as those for the GFX 100.

The Last Word – Fuji 80 mm f/1.7 on GFX 100S, Siemens star

I am surprised at how little focus shift there is.

I’ll be doing more testing, but this appears to be an excellent lens from the results seen here. I’m sure it has its foibles — what lens doesn’t? — and I hope to track them down in the next few days.

By the way, in spite of my using the nonlinear focus by wire mode, the focusing ring is overly sensitive for critical work. This is the first G lens I’ve seen with this issue.

The Last Word – GFX 100S 16-bit dark-field histograms

This has been an interesting exercise. It remains to be seen how these results relate to real photography.

The Last Word – GFX 100 PDAF banding is fixed

The 14-bit shadows are bluish, and the 16-bit ones are closer to what’s desired.

I think that 16-bit precision on the GFX 100 is no longer just for specmanship. In extreme circumstances, it is worth turning on.

The Last Word – Fuji 80 mm f/1.7 on GFX 100S, Siemens star analysis

I moved closer to the target for this test, to about 7 meters, so that the star covered about 1800 pixels in each direction. That allows the Imatest software I used to estimate modulation transfer function (MTF) for low spatial frequencies. With the exception of sharpening, the rest of the test conditions were the same as before.

The Last Word – Fujifilm 80/1.7 bokeh

The blobs are pretty clean, although they do show some onion-ring effects. The mechanical vignetting (cat’s eye) isn’t too bad. In fact, the OOF PSFs look a lot like those from the Fujifilm 110 mm f/2 lens.

The Last Word – Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals

Notice that the center of the pixel-shifted star goes gray at about the same place as it does with the normal image. There is no more extinction resolution. However, the middle of the normal image is rife with aliasing, and is improperly reconstructed. There is virtually no aliasing in the pixel-shifted image.

Pixel shifting can be a great thing, if you subject is static — I mean really, really static — and your camera is clamped to a sturdy tripod on solid ground.

The Last Word – Fujifilm 110/2, 80/1.7 slanted edge testing

It’s a tie.

The 80 mm lens is very close to the redoubtable 110 in on-axis sharpness.

The Last Word – Fujifilm GFZ 100S pixel shift, quantitative

There’s a lot more sharpening in the single shot image. That’s because the Lr default sharpening for this camera and lens always uses a 1-pixel radius, and one pixel is twice as big in the single shot image as it is in the 16-shot one, as measured in terms of field of view.

This chromatic aberration thing is going to need some more work. Is it a bug in the Fuji Pixel Stack combiner software?

The Last Word – Fuji 110/2, 80/1.7 on GFX 100S, foliage

Looks like f/8 might have been misfocused a bit with the 80. I don’t see any reason why you couldn’t use the 80 mm f/1.7 as a landscape lens at f/4 or narrower. I also don’t see much LoCA stopped down with that lens here.

The Last Word – Quick and dirty field curvature test on the Fuji 80/1.7

The lens front-focuses a bit towards the edge of the frame.

The Last Word – Fujifilm GFZ 100S pixel shift with the 110/2

The usual caveat about dividing the MTF30 and MTF50 numbers of the non-shifted image by two to compare them with the pixel shifted numbers applies. When you apply that to MTF50, you get 0.164 cy/px for the signal shot, versus 0.175 cy/px for the pixel-shifted image. The big difference is in aliasing.

By the way, there are some small-scale periodic artifacts in the pixel-shifted image.

The Last Word – Fuji 80/1.7, 110/2 chromatic aberrations compared

The new result, developed in Lightroom 10.2 with sharpening turned off, and white balance to the gray of the slanted edge.

The Last Word – Fujifilm 80 mm f/1.7 field curvature for landscape use

I still think this would make a pretty good landscape lens.

As a bonus, a 16-shot stack. You can’t normally get away with this for landscapes, but it was a very still morning.

The Last Word – Fuji 45-100 at 80 mm vs 80/1.7, foliage

Not all that different in sharpness

The Last Word – Chromatic aberration in the Fuji 45-100/4

The lens has the most CA at 45 mm and the least at 100.

The Last Word – How fast is the GFX 100S electronic shutter?

Now there are 42 bands. 8.33*42 = 350 ms, or about 1/3 of a second.

This is exactly the same as the GFX 100.

The Last Word – Chromatic aberration in the Fuji 45-100/4, 45/2.8

The zoom has more chromatic aberration, but it’s certainly not bad. Remember, the pixels referenced above are half the pitch of the GFX 100 physical pixels because of the pixel-shift processing.

The prime is sharper.

The Last Word – Choosing CoC for precision photography in practice

The good news is that DOF calculators work, although the one I used just know doesn’t include the effects of diffraction. And we know what CoC to plug in for critical work.

The bad news is that CoC will not give us much DOF. Optics is cruel sometimes.

The Last Word – Smallrig GFX 100S L-bracket

The bracket provides a useful place to put your little finger, improving the grip.

Viewed from the back, the bracket provides both portrait and landscape orientation center line markings, and they appear to be accurate.

In the past, the Smallrig brackets have not used the RRS dovetail spec, making the use of RRS cam-clamps dangerous. This bracket fits perfectly in those clamps.

The Last Word – Fujifilm G lenses hotspotting at 720 nm

OK means no hotspotting, or very little. H means hotspotting that I consider to be unacceptable. I threw the Coastal Optical 60 mm f/4 UV-VIS-IR into the mix. All lenses were tested with subjects tens of meters away. The second row is the f-stop.

The Last Word – Shutter shock in the GFX 100s

ES wins. Why? It could be that it’s better in isolation, or it could be that the 2 seconds between shots wasn’t enough time for the vibrations to die down. I ran another test with 10 seconds between shots.

The Last Word – Three dimensionality and sensor format

I do get some sense of depth in all of the images. I get more at around 4K resolution than I do with the above web-downsampled ones. I see very little depth differences between the two formats.

The Last Word – GFX 100S sensor is a 4-shot stitch

If you aren’t doing stacked astro, I don’t think this is of any concern.

The Last Word – Relative sensitivity of Sony a7RIV and GFX 100S

The red channel of the GFX appears to be substantially more sensitive than the a7RIV. With the blue channel, it’s the other way around, although not ot such a  great degree. The green channels are about the same, with the Fuji being a bit more sensitive.

The Last Word – Sheen and specular surfaces with Fuji pixel shift on the GFX 100

This is not the kind of subject for which pixel shift offers much improvement, aside from the noise reduction due to averaging.

The Last Word – Fujifilm Pixel Shift Combiner Accurate Color mode

I used a sinusoidal Siemens Star; it’s not supposed to be sharp. There is virtually no aliasing in the 400 MP image, and a fair amount in the 100 MP open.  This is about what you’d expect comparing a 4-shot pixel shift image to a 16-shot one.

The Last Word – Two ways to make 100 MP pixel-shifted images with the GFX 100S

A reader asked if you got better quality 100 MP images by using Fujifilm Pixel Shift Combiner in Accurate Color mode or by using High Resolution Plus Accurate Color mode and downsampling in post. This post attempts to answer that question, using a number of Photoshop standard resampling methods, and GigaPixel AI as well.

The Last Word – An important GFX 100S accessory

I said a few choice words, and felt stupid. I sat down at my computer and ordered a Hoodman H32MB Hoodloupe. It came yesterday.

The Last Word – Using the Fuji 250/4 and 1.4TC on the GFX 100S vs FF alternatives

You can see the aliasing quite distinctly. The Nikon zoom needs a finer-pitch sensor. Remember, this is a sinusoidal Siemens Star, so the edges aren’t supposed to be crisp. Also, this was with zero sharpening.

My take is that, especially for birds, for which aliasing is often an issue, the 250/4 and the 1.4X TC isn’t a bad choice. It’s not as sharp as a decent medium-high res full frame MILC with a really good zoom, though.

The Last Word – Fuji 23/4, 30/3.5 field curvature and corner sharpness on GFX 100S

Now the 30 looks a hair better.

Both of these lenses will do a fine job for aerials or distant landscapes.

The Last Word – Zeiss 15/2.8 Distagon, Metabones 1.26x on GFX 100S

Still not winning any prizes.

Well, it was worth a try.

The Last Word – Which is sharper on-axis, the Fuji 23/4 or 30/3.5?

No significant change.

I am beginning to raise my opinion of the 30 mm lens, and I already thought it was quite good.

The Last Word – How much sharpness do you lose with the 1.4x TC on the Fuji 250/4?

In all cases, chromatic aberration is quite low.

Fujifilm GFX News, Rumors, and Collaboration
Fujifilm GFX Owners Group

Follow Fujiaddict on Facebook, TwitterInstagram, and YouTube

Fujifilm GFX100S: B&H Photo / Amazon / Moment / Adorama
Fujifilm GFX100: B&H Photo / Amazon / Adorama
Fujifilm GFX50R: B&H Photo / Amazon / Adorama
Fujifilm GFX 50S: B&H Photo / Amazon / Adorama

Fujinon GF80mm f/1.7: B&H Photo / Amazon / Moment / Adorama
Fujinon GF30mm f/3.5 R WR: B&H Photo / Amazon / Adorama
Fujinon GF 23mm f/4 R LM WR: B&H Photo  / Amazon / Adorama
Fujinon GF 250mm f/4: B&H Photo / Amazon / Adorama
Fujinon GF 1.4x Teleconverter: B&H Photo / Amazon / Adorama

Posted in Fujifilm GFX, Fujifilm GFX 100, Fujifilm GFX 100 Megapixel, Fujifilm GFX 100S, Fujifilm GFX 50R, Fujifilm GFX 50S, Fujifilm GFX100 IR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment